Author: Alexandru Măglaș

This article clarifies the conditions for criminal liability when injury is caused by negligence, including in traffic, workplace or medical contexts. It covers thresholds that decriminalise minor harm, the role of insurance and civil claims, and the main lines of defence when causation, foreseeability or contributory fault are genuinely disputed.

The article explains how Romanian law defines bodily injury, why medical reports and “days of care” matter so much, and how intent, weapons or vulnerable victims can escalate the charge. It then looks at typical fact patterns, evidentiary issues and sentencing practice, helping both defendants and victims understand realistic outcomes.

This guide walks through the life-cycle of a Romanian criminal case from the defendant’s perspective, clarifying when you officially become a defendant and what changes procedurally. It translates abstract rights—silence, access to the file, legal assistance, appeals—into concrete decisions you must make in interrogations, searches, negotiations and trial.

The article demystifies Article 360 Criminal Code by showing how “illegal access” covers everyday situations, from logging into a partner’s account to abusing workplace credentials or probing routers. It sets out the legal elements, key case-law and investigation techniques, then offers concrete guidance for defendants and victims on evidence, strategy and mitigating damage.

This guide explains the legal conditions for preventive arrest in Romania, from seriousness of the offence to risk of reoffending, absconding or tampering with evidence. It also lays out a practical roadmap for defence: evidence to present, alternative measures to propose and how to build appeal arguments when detention is ordered or extended.

The article sets out the basic theft offence and then walks through the main aggravating circumstances—night-time, breaking in, groups, vulnerable victims and more. It uses practical scenarios to show how qualification changes sentencing ranges, what over-charging looks like, and where defence can argue misapplied qualifiers or concurrence with other offences.

This guide explains how prosecutors and police search computers, phones and cloud accounts in Romania, what warrants should contain and how forensic imaging is used. It provides step-by-step suggestions for preserving privileged or confidential data, minimising business disruption and later contesting overbroad or improperly executed searches.

The article distinguishes between frisk, full body search and intimate search, explaining the legal thresholds, authorisations and safeguards applicable to each. It then offers concrete advice on what to say, what to request to be noted in the record and how to challenge abusive or humiliating searches in court or before human-rights bodies.

The guide explains the legal framework for public judicial aid, including income-based eligibility, types of assistance (lawyer, expert fees, court taxes) and the documents courts usually request. It also highlights frequent rejection reasons and offers practical tips on timing, evidence of hardship and combining public aid with private fee arrangements.

This article walks you through each stage of a home search in Romania, from the warrant and the way officers enter, to how items are seized and recorded. It explains which rights you can insist on in real time, what should go into the official minutes, and how later to challenge unlawful evidence or claim the return of seized goods.

The article clarifies how Romanian law defines an organised criminal group, what distinguishes it from simple co-participation and why this qualification drastically changes exposure. It reviews investigative techniques, typical evidentiary patterns and key ECtHR and national decisions, then outlines concrete defence lines for challenging the existence, structure or purpose of the alleged group.

This guide explains the legal thresholds that separate a mere traffic offence from the crime of driving under the influence in Romania, and how breathalyser and blood tests fit into the evidentiary picture. It also covers penalties, aggravating factors, licence suspension and concrete defence options when procedural errors or medical issues are involved.

The article maps the statutory rules and constitutional decisions that define DNA’s material competence in abuse of office investigations, including value thresholds and aggravated forms. It then reviews recent case-law and offers defence strategies when competence is borderline, contested between units or used to justify disproportionate procedural measures.

This guide unpacks the binding interpretation given by RIL no. 11/2021 on how courts must recompute sentences when additional acts surface after an initial conviction. It provides practical pointers on when to seek recalculation, how to document the factual and legal overlap, and how to argue proportionality before sentencing and enforcement courts.

The article explains when the margin scheme can be used, how to document acquisitions from EU suppliers and what happens if conditions are not met. It includes worked examples, invoicing tips, typical ANAF challenges and how to correct past errors through amended returns or voluntary disclosure.

This guide breaks down the legal basis and conditions for suspending enforcement while a challenge is pending, with particular attention to how courts assess urgency and harm. It also walks through the security deposit arithmetic, typical mistakes parties make, and provides structured ideas for drafting motions and reply briefs.

The article explains the key holdings of ICCJ Decision no. 144/2021 on what a criminal court must actually address in its reasoning: evidence, legal tests and defence arguments. It then translates these standards into practical tools for motions, appeals and complaints to the ECtHR when judgments remain formulaic or ignore crucial submissions.

This practitioner’s guide systematises the main categories of indictment defects that can be raised in the Romanian preliminary chamber procedure, from vagueness of charges to misframed legal qualification. It then details how to structure objections, manage deadlines, build records for appeal and use procedural sanctions to reshape the future trial.

The article analyses ICCJ Decision no. 79/2021 on Article 19 of Law 682/2002, clarifying when a defendant can also qualify as a “protected witness” and what procedural and sentencing consequences follow. It offers guidance on framing cooperation, evidentiary value and proportional reductions, as well as on the risks of misusing the mechanism.

Using reported decisions from several Member States, the article shows how concerns about detention conditions, fair-trial guarantees or sentencing practice can lead to refusals to execute Romanian criminal judgments. It then extracts practical guidance for defence lawyers on framing objections, evidencing risk and using EU fundamental rights case-law effectively.

This guide walks through the EU mutual recognition tools and Council of Europe instruments that allow Romanian criminal judgments to be executed in other states. It highlights procedural pitfalls, public-policy objections, ne bis in idem arguments and practical defence angles when a client faces transfer, sentence execution or confiscation abroad.

See ten high-risk scenarios in EPPO files and the first 48-hour decisions that can protect your freedom, assets and public image.
Rezumat WordPress (excerpt): The article maps ten concrete situations defendants face in EPPO proceedings: surprise searches, cross-border evidence grabs, asset freezes, early media exposure and more. For each, it shows which reflexes are dangerous, what you should insist on procedurally and how to use the short window of the first 48 hours to build leverage instead of losing ground.

This rapid guide explains what happens when EPPO secures your assets under Regulation 2018/1805 and how ANABI steps in to manage or sell seized property. You get concrete options for challenging freezes, narrowing their scope, replacing them with guarantees and protecting assets that risk devaluation or early sale.

If you feel “under siege” in an EPPO case, this guide walks you through the real rules of the game: when EPPO is competent, how cross-border measures work and what happens in the first 72 hours. You also get a structured defence checklist, from EU-level rights to freezing orders, digital evidence and ne bis in idem arguments.

This article maps the EU’s gradual construction of criminal-law instruments – from the European Arrest Warrant and EPPO to data-retention case law and the 2023 e-evidence package. It then zooms in on Romania, explaining what these developments mean for prosecutors, courts, service providers and defence lawyers who must now operate in an increasingly integrated European criminal-justice space.

The article explains the shift from administrative breaches to fully-fledged criminal offences under Directive (EU) 2024/1226 and Romania’s forthcoming transposition. It maps new duties for banks and corporates, the role of e-evidence and the future EU AML Authority, and suggests how prosecutors and defence counsel should approach intent, complex transaction chains and cross-border cooperation.

Building on major European investigations, the article explains the legal framework for using high-tech interception data in organised crime and drug-trafficking cases. It covers European Investigation Orders, data-protection and fair-trial constraints, as well as the growing link with EU sanctions-evasion offences, giving both prosecution and defence a structured way to assess these evidence packages.

The article situates the Micula award within EU state-aid control, the Commission’s recovery decision and the CJEU’s case law on intra-EU arbitration and Article 351 TFEU. It offers practical takeaways for investors and counsel on enforcement risks, treaty-structuring choices and how far EU law can limit reliance on investment arbitration against an EU Member State.

Through real-world-style examples, the article explains how local plans (PUG), PUZ and PUD interact and why cutting corners on studies, permits and public consultations backfires later in court. It walks developers, architects and foreign investors through non-derogable rules, classic annulment grounds and the documentation you need if you want your project to actually survive legal scrutiny.

This article turns abstract patent law into concrete scenarios for software, hardware and chemistry-style inventions, showing what examiners actually look for. It outlines filing routes via OSIM, the EPO and the unitary patent, highlights common mistakes like premature disclosure and offers checklists you can use before drafting claims or signing with investors.